<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009&#8242;s Notable Cultural chevers*</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 11:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ina</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>@anton: at sabi ko nga kay simontan (na fb friend ko na! hehe!), ang kulang ko lang last year ay ang mapanood ang peryodiko ng live. sana magawa ko this year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anton: at sabi ko nga kay simontan (na fb friend ko na! hehe!), ang kulang ko lang last year ay ang mapanood ang peryodiko ng live. sana magawa ko this year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ina</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3405</link>
		<dc:creator>ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3405</guid>
		<description>@anton: i&#039;ve been wanting to write a review for the album, but i&#039;m the one who runs out of words. pero magawa ko sana soon, dahil dapat lang. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@anton: i&#8217;ve been wanting to write a review for the album, but i&#8217;m the one who runs out of words. pero magawa ko sana soon, dahil dapat lang. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 08:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3404</guid>
		<description>Hi. I work for Thirdline. We manage Peryodiko. So flattering to see people appreciate the group for what it is. Thanks for the compliment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I work for Thirdline. We manage Peryodiko. So flattering to see people appreciate the group for what it is. Thanks for the compliment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ina</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3403</link>
		<dc:creator>ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3403</guid>
		<description>hmmmm... as for capital and the refusal of it as a possibly &quot;more&quot; revolutionary trajectory... 

i really just would&#039;ve wanted to see both TNL and Adam take it to what seemed to be the path they were creating for themselves, as that of a refusal to be pre-/re-/defined by the institutions that exist and to escape its clutches as much as it can. and you&#039;re right that TNL&#039;s refusal to remove their blog archives might just create the illusion of &quot;no capital&quot; (other than the symbolic of course). on another level, it could have also forced the current mode of book-in-print production to contend with the fact that online publication has restructured/redefined/reconfigured our notions of publishing and authorship and ownership and power. at the very least. parang &quot;manlang&quot; siya.  

as for adam, let me get another cup of coffee for that. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmm&#8230; as for capital and the refusal of it as a possibly &#8220;more&#8221; revolutionary trajectory&#8230; </p>
<p>i really just would&#8217;ve wanted to see both TNL and Adam take it to what seemed to be the path they were creating for themselves, as that of a refusal to be pre-/re-/defined by the institutions that exist and to escape its clutches as much as it can. and you&#8217;re right that TNL&#8217;s refusal to remove their blog archives might just create the illusion of &#8220;no capital&#8221; (other than the symbolic of course). on another level, it could have also forced the current mode of book-in-print production to contend with the fact that online publication has restructured/redefined/reconfigured our notions of publishing and authorship and ownership and power. at the very least. parang &#8220;manlang&#8221; siya.  </p>
<p>as for adam, let me get another cup of coffee for that. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ina</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3402</link>
		<dc:creator>ina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3402</guid>
		<description>hey gelo!

super true ka diyan. though i have a soft spot for all these projects you see as &quot;simplistic&quot; or just ugly (hehe), as the freeway clothes (wait, i really do want a womanwithtwonavels dress for you know, the heck of it. actually ang issue ko sa kanila ay ang mahal at pangit ang tela, at kailangan kasing payat mo si anne curtis para maganda sa&#039;yo ang damit). anvil&#039;s repub of nickjoaquin&#039;s books, well, talaga namang pagkakakitaan din lang nila &#039;yon, i guess i just imagine that at least si nick joaquin kesa si... ehem... margie holmes? chika. ang totoo, puwede namang ma-xerox ang mga librong yan ni mang nick, return-to-cover pa, equals mas magandang papel at cover. 

but the neo-angono artists collective i still want to be surprised by, which is not to say that i &quot;like&quot; everything that they do. the last time i was in angono though, i realized that they were at that point of having ingrained their notion of public art (however that may be defined) into the lives of the angono masses, with the people involving themselves in the creation, care and maintenance, ownership of art. parang maganda pa ring tingnan kung anong kahihinatnan. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey gelo!</p>
<p>super true ka diyan. though i have a soft spot for all these projects you see as &#8220;simplistic&#8221; or just ugly (hehe), as the freeway clothes (wait, i really do want a womanwithtwonavels dress for you know, the heck of it. actually ang issue ko sa kanila ay ang mahal at pangit ang tela, at kailangan kasing payat mo si anne curtis para maganda sa&#8217;yo ang damit). anvil&#8217;s repub of nickjoaquin&#8217;s books, well, talaga namang pagkakakitaan din lang nila &#8216;yon, i guess i just imagine that at least si nick joaquin kesa si&#8230; ehem&#8230; margie holmes? chika. ang totoo, puwede namang ma-xerox ang mga librong yan ni mang nick, return-to-cover pa, equals mas magandang papel at cover. </p>
<p>but the neo-angono artists collective i still want to be surprised by, which is not to say that i &#8220;like&#8221; everything that they do. the last time i was in angono though, i realized that they were at that point of having ingrained their notion of public art (however that may be defined) into the lives of the angono masses, with the people involving themselves in the creation, care and maintenance, ownership of art. parang maganda pa ring tingnan kung anong kahihinatnan. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gelo</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3401</link>
		<dc:creator>Gelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 08:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3401</guid>
		<description>Not saying the TNL site &amp; Adam&#039;s book are minor achievements -- they are major triumphs, actually, if I had a say in it -- but what you purport to be a progressive trajectory (TNL rejecting book production as a fuck-you to notions of ownership &amp; capital, Adam declining the award) could only be a backward step: For example, regarding the potential choice to keep the TNL blog alive, it can only mystify the fact that notions of capital &amp; ownership also DO exist in the Internet (it would be naive to fetishize the world wide web as some kind of market-free vacuum of free-flowing information). Won&#039;t Adam&#039;s rejection of the award simply reinforce the phantasmatic position (&amp; I emphasize here &quot;phantasmatic&quot;) of institutional literature&#039;s machinery? Why can&#039;t his acceptance, in fact, be the consummate subversion of this institution by way of infiltration, as a means of performing how easy it is for even an outsider (not that Adam is a complete outsider; one can even probably say he was born into it) to penetrate the center, won&#039;t the more productive rebellion consist of using the prize money for the production of more books outside the radars of traditional presses w/ oppressive tastes &amp; modes of selection?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not saying the TNL site &amp; Adam&#8217;s book are minor achievements &#8212; they are major triumphs, actually, if I had a say in it &#8212; but what you purport to be a progressive trajectory (TNL rejecting book production as a fuck-you to notions of ownership &amp; capital, Adam declining the award) could only be a backward step: For example, regarding the potential choice to keep the TNL blog alive, it can only mystify the fact that notions of capital &amp; ownership also DO exist in the Internet (it would be naive to fetishize the world wide web as some kind of market-free vacuum of free-flowing information). Won&#8217;t Adam&#8217;s rejection of the award simply reinforce the phantasmatic position (&amp; I emphasize here &#8220;phantasmatic&#8221;) of institutional literature&#8217;s machinery? Why can&#8217;t his acceptance, in fact, be the consummate subversion of this institution by way of infiltration, as a means of performing how easy it is for even an outsider (not that Adam is a complete outsider; one can even probably say he was born into it) to penetrate the center, won&#8217;t the more productive rebellion consist of using the prize money for the production of more books outside the radars of traditional presses w/ oppressive tastes &amp; modes of selection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gelo</title>
		<link>http://radikalchick.com/2009s-notable-cultural-chevers/#comment-3400</link>
		<dc:creator>Gelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 07:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radikalchick.com/?p=484#comment-3400</guid>
		<description>&quot;The bigger picture of course requires that we see all these as tiny steps towards real change, the kind that revolutionizes the way we live and share culture. It would’ve been fantastic for example, had www.tunaynalalake.blogspot.com’s archives remained online, even after it said goodbye as an up-yours to the possibility of book production that’s really all about ownership and capital. Even more fantastic? Had Adam David refused his first book award: an up-yours to the academic and literary institutions that he has critiqued time and again for its patronage politics. Now that would’ve been him practicing his own patricide.&quot;

--But these are simplistic steps too. As simplistic as, say, much of the crud produced by the Neo-Angono collective (altho I still pretty much like the bulk of Wire Tuazon&#039;s oeuvre) w/c you seem to like, as simple-minded as the Freeway National Artists line of clothing (w/c makes no interesting interventions in neither art&#039;s relationship w/ the advertising/marketing world nor in the popularization of the oppressive high/institutional arts) w/c is just plain ugly (who wants to wear an Ang Kiukok anyway). Perhaps the steps toward real cultural revolts (but is a cultural revolt even necessary?) are already being taken, but some people are possibly too busy reading books published by capitalist hegemoths like Anvil &amp; feeling good about themselves &amp; their own supposedly progressive stances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The bigger picture of course requires that we see all these as tiny steps towards real change, the kind that revolutionizes the way we live and share culture. It would’ve been fantastic for example, had <a href="http://www.tunaynalalake.blogspot.com’s" rel="nofollow">http://www.tunaynalalake.blogspot.com’s</a> archives remained online, even after it said goodbye as an up-yours to the possibility of book production that’s really all about ownership and capital. Even more fantastic? Had Adam David refused his first book award: an up-yours to the academic and literary institutions that he has critiqued time and again for its patronage politics. Now that would’ve been him practicing his own patricide.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;But these are simplistic steps too. As simplistic as, say, much of the crud produced by the Neo-Angono collective (altho I still pretty much like the bulk of Wire Tuazon&#8217;s oeuvre) w/c you seem to like, as simple-minded as the Freeway National Artists line of clothing (w/c makes no interesting interventions in neither art&#8217;s relationship w/ the advertising/marketing world nor in the popularization of the oppressive high/institutional arts) w/c is just plain ugly (who wants to wear an Ang Kiukok anyway). Perhaps the steps toward real cultural revolts (but is a cultural revolt even necessary?) are already being taken, but some people are possibly too busy reading books published by capitalist hegemoths like Anvil &amp; feeling good about themselves &amp; their own supposedly progressive stances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
